Claims

Contextual diversity facilitates episodic recall but impairs recognition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In episodic memory tasks, higher contextual diversity is associated with better recall but worse recognition performance. → Jones 2017

Evidence

Jones 2017

Jones, M. N., Dye, M., & Johns, B. T. (2017). Context as an Organizing Principle of the Lexicon. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2017.03.008

q2 · i? · the article prints no effect size for this finding · review · r2

The chapter reports, citing Lohnas, Polyn, and Kahana (2011) and Anderson (1974), that in episodic memory tests "CD has been found to facilitate recall" while impairing recognition. The chapter attributes these findings to the cited studies without reproducing their effect sizes.

"Similarly, in tests of episodic memory, CD has been found to facilitate recall ( Lohnas, Polyn, & Kahana, 2011), while impairing recognition ( Anderson, 1974; Steyvers & Malmberg, 2003)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cd-facilitates-recall-impairs-recognition
title Contextual diversity facilitates episodic recall but impairs recognition
description Contextual diversity facilitates episodic recall but impairs recognition
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — jones-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.