Claims

CDA-based instruction is associated with high self-reported motivation, attitude change, and interest in text analysis among EFL students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? In a three-question researcher-made questionnaire, 98.3% reported changed attitudes toward reading texts, 91.5% reported increased motivation, and 90.5% reported increased interest in analyzing texts. → Javadi 2019

Evidence

Javadi 2019

Javadi, J., & Mohammadi, M. (2019). The Effect of Critical Discourse-Based Instruction on Iranian English Major Students’ Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 33-52. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1201136

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative, interpretive analysis of written responses to a researcher-made three-question yes/no questionnaire given to experimental-group students at the end of training; the article also reports 91.5% chose yes on motivation and 90.5% on interest in analyzing texts.

"For the first question, 98/3% of the students believed that critical instruction had changes their attitudes in reading texts."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.