CDM-estimated attainment of professional teaching standards varies non-uniformly across standards, with Standard 1 highest (0.86) and Standard 4 lowest (0.50)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In a single ITE cohort, average CDM-estimated attainment was highest for Standard 1 (0.86) and lowest for Standard 4 (0.50), with Standards 2 and 3 intermediate. → Abhinava Barthakur 2026

Evidence¶

Abhinava Barthakur 2026¶

Abhinava Barthakur, Jelena Jovanović, Ryan Baker, Vitomir Kovanović, Christopher Charles Deneen and Shane Dawson. (2026). Assessing Patterns of Students' Attainment of Professional Standards in Higher Education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 13(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2026.9035

q2 · i? · design · r2

Psychometric (CDM) analysis of assessment grades from a cohort of 178 learners across 21 mapped assessments in an Australian ITE program produced attainment probabilities per standard; the article reports the printed averages, e.g. "Standard 1 was 0.86 ( SD = 0.33)" and "Standard 4 was 0.50 (SD = 0.42)". No effect size is printed.

"The average level of attainment for Standard 1 was 0.86 ( SD = 0.33), Standard 2 was 0.59 ( SD = 0.43), Standard 3 was 0.68 (SD = 0.40), and Standard 4 was 0.50 (SD = 0.42)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Hierarchical clustering of CDM attainment probabilities identifies five learner groups with distinct patterns of professional standards attainment — related
• Standard 1 (knowing students) was attained relatively easily by all groups except the Novice group, while Standard 4 (supportive and safe environments) proved most challenging — related