Collaborative and metacognitive engagement reciprocally predict each other over time¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In Model 2, collaborative engagement at t-1 predicted increased metacognitive engagement at t (0.19), and the reciprocal relation was also observed (ME(t-1)→CEt = 0.13). → Rogat 2026

Evidence¶

Rogat 2026¶

Rogat, T. K., Traynor, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Cheng, B. H. (2026). Situating collaborative disciplinary activity: creating a space for high-quality group engagement. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09772-1

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Time series regression of engagement ratings across 2.5-minute video intervals (Research Question 2). Table 4 prints CE(t-1)→MEt = 0.19 and ME(t-1)→CEt = 0.13, coefficients interpreted as partial correlations on the within-group standardized metric; no standardized effect size beyond these coefficients is printed.

"In Model 2, there also appeared to be a temporal pattern in which CEt−1 was followed by increased MEt in the next time segment, and the reciprocal relation was also observed."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Disciplinary engagement at one interval positively predicts subsequent behavioral and collaborative engagement — related