Claims

Chart instruction significantly improved translation of the present perfect continuous sentence but not the two passive tense sentences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teaching with the Comprehensive Charts was significantly related to correct translation of the present perfect continuous sentence (p < .05), but not to translation of the passive present perfect or passive future sentences, nor to the three sentences as a whole. → Tsai 2017

Evidence

Tsai 2017

Tsai, Min-hsiu. (2017). Reusing Comprehensive Charts of Tense Forms to Teach EFL Students in a University of Science and Technology. World Journal of Education, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v7n3p115

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Chi-square analysis of translation accuracy by instruction condition (N = 228). Q1 Pearson Chi-Square = 8.045, p = .005, with 60 of 120 chart-instructed students correct versus 34 of 108 controls. The passive present perfect and passive future translations did not reach significance.

"statistical analysis reveals that in the first sentence translation, teaching with the comprehensive charts does relate to the students' acquisition of the present perfect continuous tense form at the significant level (p <.05). However, the form-focused instruction is not statistically significantly related to the tense-form translation on the second and the third sentences"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.