Claims

Chatbots were the most frequently used AI application type for supporting SRL, followed by evaluation systems

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The 14 reviewed studies used four AI application types: chatbots (7 studies, 50%), evaluation systems (5 studies, 35.71%), serious digital games (1 study), and e-textbooks (1 study). → Min Lan & Xiaofeng Zhou 2025

Evidence

Min Lan & Xiaofeng Zhou 2025

Min Lan & Xiaofeng Zhou. (2025). A qualitative systematic review on AI empowered self-regulated learning in higher education. npj Science of Learning. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-025-00319-0

q3 · i? · review · r2

Descriptive synthesis across the 14 included studies. The review states "Chatbots were the most frequently used", leveraging them for help-seeking, feedback, and learning monitoring and management.

"The reviewed studies utilized four types of AI applications: chatbots (7 studies, 50%), evaluation systems (5 studies, 35.71%), serious digital games (1 study, 7.14%), e-textbooks (1 study, 7.14%, see Table 3 for details). Chatbots were the most frequently used."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.