Claims

ChatGPT served as an emotional support agent during practicum, offering a nonjudgmental, constantly available interlocutor

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Six participants asked 18 questions addressing emotionally challenging topics over twelve weeks, of which 14 concerned difficulties with mentor teachers. → Saadet Korucu-Kış 2026 q2 i? Participants reported psychological safety, saying the tool's non-human, nonjudgmental nature let them ask questions they would hesitate to ask a mentor. → Saadet Korucu-Kış 2026 (2)

Evidence

Saadet Korucu-Kış 2026

Saadet Korucu-Kış, Arif Bakla. (2026). Exploring pre-service EFL teachers’ perceptions, use cases and questioning practices of ChatGPT during practicum: a critical digital pedagogy perspective. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09783-6

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Content analysis of interaction screenshots in the case study. The article reports that of these 18 emotionally laden questions, 14 concerned difficulties with mentor teachers, with others concerning classroom incidents, assessment challenges, lack of confidence, and inclusive practices (Fig. 1).

"Over the twelve-week period, six participants asked totally 18 questions addressing emotionally challenging topics."

Saadet Korucu-Kış 2026 (2)

Saadet Korucu-Kış, Arif Bakla. (2026). Exploring pre-service EFL teachers’ perceptions, use cases and questioning practices of ChatGPT during practicum: a critical digital pedagogy perspective. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-026-09783-6

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

Participant quote from reflective essays and focus group interviews in the case study. Participants described psychological safety enabled by the tool's non-human nature, and ChatGPT's responses to emotional queries opened with empathetic framing before offering concrete strategies.

"Maybe you hesitate to ask questions to your mentor, but you can express yourself easily because you know that ChatGPT will not judge you"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id chatgpt-emotional-support-agent-practicum
title ChatGPT served as an emotional support agent during practicum, offering a nonjudgmental, constantly available interlocutor
description ChatGPT served as an emotional support agent during practicum, offering a nonjudgmental, constantly available interlocutor
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — saadet-korucu-kış-2026, saadet-korucu-kış-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.