No school type stood out on TAP performance, but charter schools had substantially lower dropout rates after controlling for incoming student characteristics¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2002 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? No particular type of school (neighborhood, vocational, charter or small, extended elementary, or selective admissions) was especially effective at improving TAP performance, with individual schools from each category standing out; however, charter schools had substantially lower dropout rates after controlling for incoming student characteristics, and selective admissions schools also did well. → Shazia Rafiullah Miller 2002
Evidence¶
Shazia Rafiullah Miller 2002¶
Shazia Rafiullah Miller, Elaine M. Allensworth, Julie Reed Kochanek. (2002). Student Performance: Course Taking, Test Scores, and Outcomes — The State of Chicago Public High Schools: 1993 to 2000. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/student-performance-course-taking-test-scores-and-outcomes
q2 · i? · associational · r3
School-by-school comparison of TAP performance and dropout rates across CPS high school types, controlling for the characteristics of incoming students. The report found no school type especially effective on the TAP, while "Charter schools had substan- tially lower dropout rates after controlling for the characteristics of their incoming students."
"No particular type of school (neighborhood, vocational, charter or small, extended elementary, or selective admissions) was especially effective at improving students’ performance on the TAP; individual schools from each category stood out."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Graduation rates differ largely across Chicago schools, with many new charter and magnet schools and several neighborhood high schools showing exceptionally high rates beyond what incoming freshman characteristics would predict — related
- There was substantial variation among charter high schools on test scores, college enrollment, and college selectivity—more variation than among non-charter schools once incoming characteristics were controlled — related
- Charter high school students had better attendance and test scores than comparable non-charter students, controlling for incoming characteristics — related
- Charter high school students had comparable high school graduation but much higher four-year college enrollment, selective-college enrollment, and four-semester college completion than comparable non-charter students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
chicago-charter-schools-lower-dropout-rates |
title |
No school type stood out on TAP performance, but charter schools had substantially lower dropout rates after controlling for incoming student characteristics |
description |
No school type stood out on TAP performance, but charter schools had substantially lower dropout rates after controlling for incoming student characteristics |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2002 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — shazia-rafiullah-miller-2002 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.