Claims

Among eligible students, Chicago Connected participation increased remote learning engagement for high pre-pandemic GPA students but decreased it for low pre-pandemic GPA students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Participation was associated with an increase in remote learning engagement for students with high pre-pandemic GPAs (by 0.06 SD) and a decrease for students with low pre-pandemic GPAs (by 0.11 SD). → Schachner 2025

Evidence

Schachner 2025

Schachner, J.N., Marwell, N.P., de la Torre, M., Gwynne, J.A., & Allensworth, E.M. (2025). How did Chicago Connected broadband access eligibility and participation affect remote learning engagement and achievement during the COVID-19 pandemic? Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://edworkingpapers.com/ai25-1153

q2 · i? · associational · r2

OLS multivariate models on 77,056 CPS students in grades 5-8 predicted a three-component Google Classroom engagement index as a function of program participation, adjusting for student and pandemic-era controls. Participation showed "an increase in remote learning engagement for students with high pre-pandemic GPAs (by 0.06 SD)" and a decrease of 0.11 SD for low-GPA students; no standardized effect size beyond these SD-scaled coefficients is printed.

"Among eligible students, participation was associated with an increase in remote learning engagement for students with high pre-pandemic GPAs (by 0.06 SD) and a decrease in remote learning engagement for students with low pre-pandemic GPAs (by 0.11 SD)."

Studies bearing on this claim

Does supplying the missing connectivity or devices close the gap for learners without access? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 5 narrower claims that bear on it: 3 distinct studies (2 associational, 1 theoretical), q1–q2, 0 of 3 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.

Study Design Effect as recorded Bears on this claim through
Schachner 2025 q2 · associational · r2 i? this claim; Chicago Connected eligibility was associated with higher fall 2020 engagement for high pre (supports); Chicago Connected eligibility was associated with a slightly lower fall 2020 GPA in the fu (qualifies); Differences in engagement and achievement between high- and low-GPA students grew more sha (supports)
Feng 2025 q2 · associational · r1 i? Implementation data show teachers shifted independent practice toward in-class ASSISTments (supports)
Michael Rowe 2026 q1 · theoretical · r3 i? Physical access to AI-provided material does not automatically produce epistemological acc (qualifies)

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id chicago-connected-participation-heterogeneous-engagement-effects
title Among eligible students, Chicago Connected participation increased remote learning engagement for high pre-pandemic GPA students but decreased it for low pre-pandemic GPA students
description Among eligible students, Chicago Connected participation increased remote learning engagement for high pre-pandemic GPA students but decreased it for low pre-pandemic GPA students
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — schachner-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.