Claims

Chinese middle-school students endorse significantly more fixed mindsets of intelligence than US students (PISA 2018)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Chinese students held significantly more fixed mindsets than US students in the PISA 2018 sample, with 68.39% of US students versus 55.61% of Chinese students regarding intelligence as malleable. → Xin Sun 2021

Evidence

Xin Sun 2021

Xin Sun, Shaylene Nancekivell, Susan A. Gelman and Priti Shah. (2021). Growth mindset and academic outcomes: a comparison of US and Chinese students. npj Science of Learning 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00100-z

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Regression analysis of the PISA 2018 dataset showed "significance for country, βcountry = 0.24, SEcountry = 0.02, t = 11.59", with a 95% CI of (0.20, 0.28), showing Chinese students held significantly more fixed mindsets.

"Notably, 68.39% of the US students regarded intelligence as malleable (choosing “1-Strongly Disagree ” or “2-Disagree”), compared to only 55.61% of the Chinese students."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id chinese-students-more-fixed-mindsets-than-us-pisa-2018
title Chinese middle-school students endorse significantly more fixed mindsets of intelligence than US students (PISA 2018)
description Chinese middle-school students endorse significantly more fixed mindsets of intelligence than US students (PISA 2018)
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — xin-sun-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.