Most low-scoring students were placed in level 103 (high elementary) of the CIEP following the placement test¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Based on the ELS placement test, students were distributed across 5 levels (101 to 105), with most placed in level 103 (56.7%). → Mukundan et al. 2012
Evidence¶
Mukundan et al. 2012¶
Jayakaran Mukundan, Elaheh Hamed Mahvelati & Vahid Nimehchisalem. (2012). The Effect of an Intensive English Program on Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Language Proficiency. English Language Teaching, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p1
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Procedure section reporting placement test results for the 30 students. The article states students "were distributed across 5 levels in the Certified Intensive En glish Program (CIEP), leve ls 101 to 105 with most being placed in high elementary, 103".
"Based on their performance, they were distributed across 5 levels in the Certified Intensive En glish Program (CIEP), leve ls 101 to 105 with most being placed in high elementary, 103 (Table 1)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- All 30 students passed their assigned CIEP levels and 17 students moved out of the elementary level by passing level 103 — related
- A one-month intensive English program significantly improved general English proficiency scores of low-scoring Malaysian secondary students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.