Claims

Most low-scoring students were placed in level 103 (high elementary) of the CIEP following the placement test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Based on the ELS placement test, students were distributed across 5 levels (101 to 105), with most placed in level 103 (56.7%). → Mukundan et al. 2012

Evidence

Mukundan et al. 2012

Jayakaran Mukundan, Elaheh Hamed Mahvelati & Vahid Nimehchisalem. (2012). The Effect of an Intensive English Program on Malaysian Secondary School Students’ Language Proficiency. English Language Teaching, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p1

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Procedure section reporting placement test results for the 30 students. The article states students "were distributed across 5 levels in the Certified Intensive En glish Program (CIEP), leve ls 101 to 105 with most being placed in high elementary, 103".

"Based on their performance, they were distributed across 5 levels in the Certified Intensive En glish Program (CIEP), leve ls 101 to 105 with most being placed in high elementary, 103 (Table 1)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.