Citation network analysis shows limited integration: very low density and 38.90% isolated nodes among same-prompt-type studies¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? The complete citation network encompassed 941 publications and 1,547 citation links with very low overall density (0.0017) and 366 isolated nodes (38.90% of the 941 papers). → Jasmin Breitwieser 2026

Evidence¶

Jasmin Breitwieser 2026¶

Jasmin Breitwieser, André Bittermann, Maria Theobald, Tim Lauer, Mirijam Schaaf, Garvin Brod. (2026). Digital Prompting in Education: A Design Framework and Bibliometric Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10164-1

q3 · i? · associational · r2

Citation network analysis based on 686 citing–cited publication pairs, limited to the 943 publications (76.29%) with DOIs, using OpenAlex metadata. The article reports the printed density and isolation figures as evidence that even same-prompt-type studies often fail to cite each other.

"Although the complete network encompassed 941 publications and 1,547 citation links, it showed a very low overall density (0.0017; i.e., 0.17% of all possible citation connections are actually present) and consisted of 366 isolated nodes (38.90% of the 941 papers)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A worked network example shows diffusion-based centralities capturing uptake and argumentation more accurately than traditional centrality measures — related
• Across three neural-network lectures, evidence and confidence checks retained 1,022 of 1,155 raw concept mentions (88.48%) and 312 of 400 raw relationship mentions (78.00%), yielding 172 canonical concepts and 282 graph relationships with 90.38% endpoint coverage — related