Clarification requests show a three-way interaction of proficiency pairing, time and language, declining over time only in matched dyads and in the L1¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A significant three-way interaction (F(1, 72) = 4.225, p = .043) yielded significantly higher clarification requests at Time 1 (M = 4.99) than Time 2 (M = 1.41) in matched dyads and in the L1. → Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 2020
Evidence¶
Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester 2020¶
Elisabet Pladevall-Ballester, Alexandra Vraciu. (2020). EFL child peer interaction: Measuring the effect of time, proficiency pairing and language of interaction. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 10(3), 449-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2020.10.3.3
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Three-way interaction from the generalized linear mixed model on clarification requests in the two-year dyad study; the pairwise time comparison was significant only for matched dyads in the L1.
"A significant three-way interaction was found between proficiency pairing, time and language (F(1, 72) = 4.225, p = .043), where a pairwise comparison on the basis of time determined a significantly higher percentage of clarification requests at Time 1 (M = 4.99, SD = 3.02) than at Time 2 ( M = 1.41, SD = 2.52) in matched dyads and in the L1 ( F(1,72) = 8.008, p = .006)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Strategy-specific effects: time affects self-repetitions and marginally clarification requests; proficiency pairing affects confirmation checks and negative feedback; language affects other-repetitions and negative feedback — related
- Mixed proficiency dyads negotiate for meaning more than matched proficiency dyads, irrespective of time and language — related
- Within-language strategy profiles differ: other-repetition prevails in the L2 while clarification requests prevail in the L1, with negative feedback least used — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
clarification-requests-three-way-interaction |
title |
Clarification requests show a three-way interaction of proficiency pairing, time and language, declining over time only in matched dyads and in the L1 |
description |
Clarification requests show a three-way interaction of proficiency pairing, time and language, declining over time only in matched dyads and in the L1 |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — elisabet-pladevall-ballester-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.