Claims

Class-level initial reading achievement does not moderate effects on content reading comprehension

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 The interaction of the between-class part of general reading comprehension with treatment on content reading comprehension was nonsignificant (p = .708; ES = .006). → Jeanne Wanzek 2019

Evidence

Jeanne Wanzek 2019

Jeanne Wanzek, Greg Roberts, Sharon Vaughn, Elizabeth Swanson, and Katherine Sargent. (2019). Examining the Role of Pre-Instruction Academic Performance Within A Text-based Approach to Improving Student Content Knowledge and Understanding. Exceptional Children, 85(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402918783187

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Model 4 of the latent moderated SEM analysis tested the moderating effect of Gates-MacGinitie reading achievement on treatment effects for ASK content reading comprehension, with pretest comprehension as latent covariate. The interaction was "nonsignificant (p = .708; ES = .006)" and follow-up tests at different moderator values were also nonsignificant.

"The interaction of the B part of general reading comprehension and treatment X is nonsignificant (p = .708; ES = .006), as were the follow-up tests at different values of the moderator."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.