Claims

Teacher-guided classroom discussion before reflection prompts yields higher learning gains than all other support conditions, especially on application-level items

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students in the example + discussion + prompts condition showed significantly higher learning gains on application-level items than all other conditions, and higher conceptual-level gains than the control and example conditions. → Elise H. Eshuis 2022 q3 i? The mixed MANOVA showed a significant Time*Condition interaction for both conceptual and application level items. → Elise H. Eshuis 2022 (2)

Evidence

Elise H. Eshuis 2022

Elise H. Eshuis, Judith ter Vrugte, Ton de Jong. (2022). Supporting reflection to improve learning from self-generated concept maps. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09299-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Quasi-experiment with 144 secondary vocational students (final sample) in four cumulative conditions; mixed MANOVA with Bonferroni-controlled post-hoc comparisons on learning gains. The discussion condition beat "all other conditions" on application level (control p = 0.026; example p = 0.046; example + prompts p = 0.014).

"Post-hoc comparisons (Bonferroni controlled) on these learning gains (i.e., pretest score to posttest score) showed that the found multivariate effect of Condition could be explained from significantly higher learning gains on the application level in the example + discussion + prompts condition compared to all other conditions"

Elise H. Eshuis 2022 (2)

Elise H. Eshuis, Judith ter Vrugte, Ton de Jong. (2022). Supporting reflection to improve learning from self-generated concept maps. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-022-09299-7

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Mixed MANOVA on pre- and posttest scores (conceptual and application level as dependent variables) found a significant multivariate Time*Condition interaction, F(6, 278) = 2.56, p = 0.020, ηp2 = 0.052, indicating condition differences in learning gains.

"a significant interaction effect of Time*Condition, F(6, 278) = 2.56, p = 0.020; Wilk's Λ = 0.898, ηp2 = 0.052"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id classroom-discussion-before-prompts-higher-concept-map-learning-gains
title Teacher-guided classroom discussion before reflection prompts yields higher learning gains than all other support conditions, especially on application-level items
description Teacher-guided classroom discussion before reflection prompts yields higher learning gains than all other support conditions, especially on application-level items
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — elise-h-eshuis-2022, elise-h-eshuis-2022-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.