Clicker participation and homework completion each significantly predict performance on isomorphic exam questions, with no synergistic interaction¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Being present for a targeted clicker question and completing a homework explanation each had significant effects on later exam performance, without synergistic benefits of doing both. → Dana L. Kirkwood-Watts 2022
Evidence¶
Dana L. Kirkwood-Watts 2022¶
Dana L. Kirkwood-Watts, Emily K. Bremers, Emily A. Robinson, Kathleen R. Brazeal, and Brian A. Couch. (2022). Revisiting Clickers: In-Class Questions Followed by At-Home Reflections Are Associated with Higher Student Performance on Related Exam Questions. Journal of Microbiology and Biology Education. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00038-22
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Observational analysis of 346 consenting students in two sections of an introductory biology course using generalized linear mixed models; Table 2 prints clicker participation (P < 0.001) and homework completed (P < 0.001) as significant, and "The interaction term between these variables was not retained."
"At the whole-class level, we found that being present for a targeted clicker question and completing a homework explanation each had significant effects on later exam performance (Fig. 2A and T able 2)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
-
Classroom quizzing delivered by clickers, computer software, or paper improves student performance on classroom exams in middle school and college courses — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Assessment for learning improves achievement — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Peer Discussion Improves Conceptual Understanding — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Any clicker participation outperforms absence on exam questions, but the lowest quartile sees no significant benefit — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Homework explanations demonstrating understanding predict better isomorphic exam performance across all quartiles — related
- Being present for a clicker question predicts a higher likelihood of providing a homework explanation demonstrating understanding, except in the lowest quartile — related
- Completing the follow-up homework assignment modestly boosted exam question performance — related
- Students answering both clicker votes correctly score significantly higher on isomorphic exam questions than all other vote patterns — related
- Participating in peer assessment produced a statistically significant but negligible improvement (d = .115) in short-term achievement on unit quizzes in a college statistics course — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
clicker-participation-and-homework-completion-predict-exam-performance |
title |
Clicker participation and homework completion each significantly predict performance on isomorphic exam questions, with no synergistic interaction |
description |
Clicker participation and homework completion each significantly predict performance on isomorphic exam questions, with no synergistic interaction |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — dana-l-kirkwood-watts-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.