Claims

The most frequent CLIL applications targeted answering information questions and including short texts in the simple present, and these items reached satisfactory approval averages

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across the 17 CLIL applications, items G (answering information questions using the simple present) and Q (including short texts in simple present) were the most frequent, and items G, Q, I, J and N had approval averages considered satisfactory. → Carolina Salamanca & Sara I Montoya 2018

Evidence

Carolina Salamanca & Sara I Montoya 2018

Carolina Salamanca & Sara I Montoya. (2018). Using CLIL Approach to Improve English Language in a Colombian Higher Educational Institution. English Language Teaching, Vol. 11, No. 11. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n11p19

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive monitoring-format data from the 17 CLIL applications (Table 4): item G ran 10 times with average 84.25, item Q 12 times with average 83.99, total frequency 39 and overall average 61.87. The article calls the averages of items G, Q, I, J and N "satisfactory".

"Of these, the most frequent are G (To adequately answers information questions using the simple present), and Q (To include short texts in simple present)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.