Claims

Observation of CLIL science lessons showed meaningful language use, teacher scaffolding, code-switching, and development of both social and academic language

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Video-taped observation data indicated CLIL provided opportunities for acquiring language in meaningful settings, with teacher interaction, scaffolding, code-switching to L1, and attention to both social and academic language. → Xanthou 2011

Evidence

Xanthou 2011

Maria Xanthou. (2011). The impact of CLIL on L2 vocabulary development and content knowledge. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 10(4). http://education.waikato.ac.nz/research/files/etpc/files/2011v10n4art7.pdf

q1 · i? · causal · r2

Qualitative observation of three video-taped CLIL science lessons. The article describes meaningful contexts for target words such as "deformation", teachers repeating and expanding students' answers, an oral gap-filling strategy, code-switching used "when necessary in order to facilitate knowledge retrieval", and restating conclusions in academic L2 language.

"Observation data showed that CLIL provides opportunities for acquiring language in meaningful settings."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.