Clinical-significance analysis replicated the community interaction: Level C versus control differed significantly in Aurora and marginally in Chicago schools¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2002 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Cross-tabulating change in clinical status (TRF Externalizing T ≥ 67) against condition showed a significant Level C versus control difference in Aurora and a marginal effect in Chicago. → Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group 2002
Evidence¶
Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group 2002¶
Metropolitan Area Child Study Research Group. (2002). A Cognitive–Ecological Approach to Preventing Aggression in Urban Settings: Initial Outcomes for High-Risk Children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006x.70.1.179
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Supplementary clinical-significance analysis of the early intervention, categorizing participants by change in clinical status on TRF Externalizing scores using Achenbach's cut score of T ≥ 67. The article reports the significant Aurora difference and marginal Chicago effect; no effect size is printed.
"There was a significant difference between Level C treatment and control in the Aurora schools, /H92732(2, N /H11005315) /H1100521.65, p /H11021.001, and a marginal effect in the Chicago schools, /H92732(2, N /H11005264) /H110055.27, p /H11021.10."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Early comprehensive (Level C) intervention effects on high-risk children's aggression interacted with community type, decreasing aggression in Aurora but increasing it in Chicago — related
- For children receiving both early and late intervention, the Level C Community × Treatment interaction replicated: Aurora treated children decreased in aggression while Chicago treated children increased — related
- Late-delivered Level A and Level C interventions showed no detectable effect on high-risk children's aggression — related
- Early-delivered Level A (classroom-only) and Level B (classroom plus small-group) interventions showed no significant effects on high-risk children's aggression — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
clinical-significance-level-c-community-difference |
title |
Clinical-significance analysis replicated the community interaction: Level C versus control differed significantly in Aurora and marginally in Chicago schools |
description |
Clinical-significance analysis replicated the community interaction: Level C versus control differed significantly in Aurora and marginally in Chicago schools |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2002 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — metropolitan-area-child-study-research-group-2002 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.