Coaching is known to improve student performance on high-stakes tests, motivating the question for low-stakes tests¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Coaching is known to improve student performance on tests with high personal relevance (high-stakes tests). → Brunner 2007

Evidence¶

Brunner 2007¶

Brunner, M.; Artelt, C.; Krauss, Stefan; Baumert, J. (2007). Coaching for the PISA test. Learning and Instruction 17 (2), S. 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.002

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Background premise stated in the abstract, cited by the authors as established knowledge: "Coaching is known to improve student performance on tests with high personal relevance." The article offers no new data for this premise in the available text; it motivates the low-stakes question.

"Coaching is known to improve student performance on tests with high personal relevance (“high-stakes tests”)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Only the combined effects of pretesting and coaching have substantial positive effects on student performance on the low-stakes PISA assessments — related
• The study addresses whether performance on the low-stakes PISA reading and mathematics assessments can be fostered by coaching and pretesting — related