Claims

A planned contrast showed coached and uncoached at-risk GPA trends diverged in different directions beginning at the onset of coaching

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · q3 peer-reviewed experiment
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The COHORT by TIME interaction at the start of 9th grade was highly significant and showed trends for coached and uncoached at-risk students going in different directions, beginning at the onset of coaching. → Zeller 2013

q3 i? The COHORT by TIME interaction effect capturing the central hypothesis was statistically significant (Wald χ2 df=15 = 150.33, p < .0001). → Zeller 2013

Evidence

Zeller 2013

Zeller, P. J., Carpenter, S., Lacefield, W. E., & Applegate, E. B. (2013). Graduation coaching in a rural district school. GEAR UP Learning Centers, Western Michigan University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1033208

q3 · i?

Planned contrast at the middle-school-to-high-school transition comparing coached versus uncoached at-risk students' GPA trajectories. The contrast was "highly significant" and located the effect at the start of coaching.

"This also was highly significant (Wald χ2 df=1 = 22.84, p < .0001) and showed (1) that the trends for at-risk students who were coached and those who were not coached go in different directions and (2) that this effect begins at the onset of coaching."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
aliases cohort-time-interaction-coaching-effect
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.