Recognized cognitive principles for student-centered, Web-based learning are critically reviewed with a call for further in-depth study¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2009 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The Hannafin, Hannafin and Gabbitas paper critically reviews recognized cognitive principles for the design of student-centered, Web-based learning and argues more in-depth study of design and student performance is needed. → Dirk Ifenthaler 2009

Evidence¶

Dirk Ifenthaler 2009¶

Dirk Ifenthaler, Pedro Isaías, J. Michael Spector, Kinshuk, Demetrios Sampson. (2009). Editors' introduction to the special issue on cognition & learning technology. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9127-8

q1 · i? · review · r?

Editors' summary of the sixth special issue paper, which examines the challenges student-centered, Web-facilitated learning places on learners to take responsibility for goals, monitor progress, and assess learning agendas. This is a critical review, not a new empirical study.

"Recognized cognitive principles for the design of student-centered, Web-based learning are critically reviewed, and the need for further in-depth study of both design and student performance in these environments is discussed"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The commentary calls for future research to examine what student-centered learning in online environments looks like in different contexts — related
• Lee and Hannafin's framework holds that learners in student-centered classrooms need autonomy, scaffolding, and authentic audiences to enhance engagement — related
• Underlying assumptions dictate how the five foundations are operationalized in a learning environment — related