Claims

Items requiring integration have higher relative item difficulty than items requiring selecting or organizing, and delayed perceived task difficulty ratings appear closer to integrating-item difficulty, though that correlation comparison is not significant

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Relative item difficulty differs significantly across cognitive processes (Welch's F(2, 80.030) = 4.94, p = 0.009), with Bonferroni post-hoc differences between integrating and selecting and between integrating and organizing. → Schuessler 2025 q2 i? Correlations between perceived task difficulty and relative item difficulty were higher for integrating items (r = -0.71) than for selecting (r = -0.64) or organizing (r = -0.60), but the comparisons were small and not significant. → Schuessler 2025 (2) q2 i? Relative item difficulty of integrating items explains 50.5% of variance in perceived task difficulty, more than selecting (40.3%) or organizing (35.9%). → Schuessler 2025 (3)

Evidence

Schuessler 2025

Schuessler, K., Fischer, V., & Walpuski, M. (2025). Investigating construct validity of cognitive load measurement using single-item subjective rating scales. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09692-6

q2 · i? · associational · r?

One-way ANOVA (Welch's F, as homogeneity of variance was violated) on 43 selecting, 41 organizing, and 42 integrating items; the post-hoc tests show "selecting < integrating" and "organizing < integrating", while selecting and organizing did not differ significantly. Only F and p are printed.

"The results indicate a significant difference for cognitive processes (selecting, organizing, integrating) concerning relative item difficulty, F(2, 80.030) = 4.94, p = 0.009. Post-hoc tests (Bonferroni) reveal significant differences for relative item difficulty between integrating and selecting (p = 0.004, selecting < integrating) and integrating and organizing (p = 0.046, organizing < integrating)."

Schuessler 2025 (2)

Schuessler, K., Fischer, V., & Walpuski, M. (2025). Investigating construct validity of cognitive load measurement using single-item subjective rating scales. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09692-6

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Correlations of perceived task difficulty with relative item difficulty per process: r = -0.64 (selecting, n = 43), r = -0.60 (organizing, n = 41), r = -0.71 (integrating, n = 42); differences of q = 0.14 and q = 0.20 were "small effects, but not significant", so no null-hypothesis test confirmed the pattern.

"Nevertheless, the comparison of correlation coefficients is not significant."

Schuessler 2025 (3)

Schuessler, K., Fischer, V., & Walpuski, M. (2025). Investigating construct validity of cognitive load measurement using single-item subjective rating scales. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-024-09692-6

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Three separate regressions at item-group level; selecting items explained 40.3% and organizing items 35.9% of perceived task difficulty variance, both "less than the 50.5%" explained by integrating items. Only R² values are printed, so impact is coded null.

"Both explain less than the 50.5% of variance in perceived task difficulty, R 2 = 0.51, F(1, 40) = 40.88, p ≤ 0.001, nitems int = 42, which is explained when the relative item difficulty of items asking students to integrate is used as a predictor."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cognitive-process-integration-raises-item-difficulty
title Items requiring integration have higher relative item difficulty than items requiring selecting or organizing, and delayed perceived task difficulty ratings appear closer to integrating-item difficulty, though that correlation comparison is not significant
description Items requiring integration have higher relative item difficulty than items requiring selecting or organizing, and delayed perceived task difficulty ratings appear closer to integrating-item difficulty, though that co...
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 3 — schuessler-2025, schuessler-2025-2, schuessler-2025-3

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.