In Miami-Dade County, Cognitive Tutor Algebra I students significantly outscored peers on the 2003 FCAT, with especially large pass-rate differences for Exceptional Student Education and limited-English-proficiency students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? 35.7% of Exceptional Student Education students using Cognitive Tutor passed the FCAT versus 10.9% with a different curriculum; 27% versus 18.9% for limited English proficiency students. → Ritter 2007
Evidence¶
Ritter 2007¶
Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194060
q2 · i? · review · r1
The same Miami-Dade analysis reported particularly dramatic findings for special populations: 35.7% of Exceptional Student Education Cognitive Tutor students passed the FCAT versus 10.9% with another curriculum; the article prints no effect size for this contrast.
"The study showed that 35.7% of students receiving Exceptional Student Education who use Cognitive Tutor passed the FCAT, in comparison with only 10.9% of such students who used a different curriculum."
Ritter 2007 (2)¶
Ritter, S., Anderson, J. R., Koedinger, K. R., & Corbett, A. (2007). Cognitive Tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(2), 249-255. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03194060
q2 · i? · design · r2
The same district analysis reported that among students with limited English proficiency, 27% of Cognitive Tutor students passed the FCAT versus 18.9% of such students in another curriculum; no effect size is printed for this contrast.
"For students with limited English proficiency, 27% of Cognitive Tutor students passed the FCAT, as opposed to only 18.9% of such students in another curriculum."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Cognitive Tutor Algebra I students significantly outscored peers on standardized tests by about 0.3 SDs and by 85% on problem-solving and multiple-representation tests, with effect sizes of 0.7 to 1.2 SDs — related
- Cognitive Tutor® Algebra I shows no discernible effects on general mathematics achievement for secondary students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cognitive-tutor-miami-dade-fcat-pass-rates |
title |
In Miami-Dade County, Cognitive Tutor Algebra I students significantly outscored peers on the 2003 FCAT, with especially large pass-rate differences for Exceptional Student Education and limited-English-proficiency students |
description |
In Miami-Dade County, Cognitive Tutor Algebra I students significantly outscored peers on the 2003 FCAT, with especially large pass-rate differences for Exceptional Student Education and limited-English-proficiency st... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-16 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — ritter-2007, ritter-2007-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.