Claims

Cognitive-only coaching increased deep and achieving learning approaches, academic self-concept, and reduced test anxiety and anxiety/depression, but academic performance declined relative to control; behavioural-only coaching decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance with no other effects.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2001 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 3 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The cognitive-only coaching program increased deep and achieving approaches to learning and academic self-concepts, reduced test anxiety and nonstudy-related anxiety and depression, while academic performance declined relative to the control group. → Grant 2001 q2 i? The behavioural-only coaching program decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance, with no other effects found. → Grant 2001 (2)

Evidence

Grant 2001

Grant, Anthony M. (2001). Towards a Psychology of Coaching: The Impact of Coaching on Metacognition, Mental Health and Goal Attainment. Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED478147

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Study 1 of the three-study series assigned trainee accountants to a cognitive-based coaching program and measured GPA, study approaches, self-concept, test anxiety and affect. The dissertation reports these outcomes, including a relative decline in academic performance versus control; no effect sizes are printed in the supplied text.

"Participation in the cognitive only program increased deep and achieving approaches to learning, academic self-concepts, reduced test anxiety and nonstudy-related anxiety and depression. Academic performance declined relative to the control group."

Grant 2001 (2)

Grant, Anthony M. (2001). Towards a Psychology of Coaching: The Impact of Coaching on Metacognition, Mental Health and Goal Attainment. Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED478147

q2 · i? · causal · r?

Study 2 evaluated a behavioural-based coaching program with trainee accountants. The dissertation reports decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance, and states no other effects were found; no effect sizes are printed in the supplied text.

"Participation in the behavioural only coaching program decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance. No other effects were found."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id cognitive-versus-behavioural-coaching-differential-effects
title Cognitive-only coaching increased deep and achieving learning approaches, academic self-concept, and reduced test anxiety and anxiety/depression, but academic performance declined relative to control; behavioural-only coaching decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance with no other effects.
description Cognitive-only coaching increased deep and achieving learning approaches, academic self-concept, and reduced test anxiety and anxiety/depression, but academic performance declined relative to control; behavioural-only...
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2001
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — grant-2001, grant-2001-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.