Cognitive-only coaching increased deep and achieving learning approaches, academic self-concept, and reduced test anxiety and anxiety/depression, but academic performance declined relative to control; behavioural-only coaching decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance with no other effects.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2001 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on an ERIC document (a report, conference paper or thesis). It is kept because 3 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The cognitive-only coaching program increased deep and achieving approaches to learning and academic self-concepts, reduced test anxiety and nonstudy-related anxiety and depression, while academic performance declined relative to the control group. → Grant 2001
q2 i? The behavioural-only coaching program decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance, with no other effects found. → Grant 2001 (2)
Evidence¶
Grant 2001¶
Grant, Anthony M. (2001). Towards a Psychology of Coaching: The Impact of Coaching on Metacognition, Mental Health and Goal Attainment. Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED478147
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Study 1 of the three-study series assigned trainee accountants to a cognitive-based coaching program and measured GPA, study approaches, self-concept, test anxiety and affect. The dissertation reports these outcomes, including a relative decline in academic performance versus control; no effect sizes are printed in the supplied text.
"Participation in the cognitive only program increased deep and achieving approaches to learning, academic self-concepts, reduced test anxiety and nonstudy-related anxiety and depression. Academic performance declined relative to the control group."
Grant 2001 (2)¶
Grant, Anthony M. (2001). Towards a Psychology of Coaching: The Impact of Coaching on Metacognition, Mental Health and Goal Attainment. Doctoral dissertation, Macquarie University. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED478147
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Study 2 evaluated a behavioural-based coaching program with trainee accountants. The dissertation reports decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance, and states no other effects were found; no effect sizes are printed in the supplied text.
"Participation in the behavioural only coaching program decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance. No other effects were found."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Affect Regulation — outcome: instruction changes it
- Academic Anxiety — outcome: instruction changes it
- Academic Self-Concept — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- A combined cognitive and behavioural coaching program outperformed cognitive-only and behavioural-only programs for academic performance, with gains maintained at follow-up only for the combined program. — related
- Participation in a solution-focused cognitive-behavioural life coaching program is associated with significantly enhanced mental health, quality of life and increased goal attainment in normal adults. — related
- Using the ITS reduced executive state-math anxiety and improved algebra learning across conditions — related
- Problem-based curricula enhance deep approaches and discourage surface approaches compared with subject-based curricula — related
- Across all RCTs, mindfulness-based interventions significantly improve mindfulness, executive functioning, attention, depression, anxiety/stress and negative behaviours in youth, with small effect sizes — related
- Students whose anxiety, surprise or enjoyment decreased over the course achieved more positive learning-outcome change than students with stable trajectories in those emotions. — related
- When only RCTs with active control groups are analysed, MBI benefits are restricted to Mindfulness (d = .42), Depression (d = .47) and Anxiety/Stress (d = .18) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
cognitive-versus-behavioural-coaching-differential-effects |
title |
Cognitive-only coaching increased deep and achieving learning approaches, academic self-concept, and reduced test anxiety and anxiety/depression, but academic performance declined relative to control; behavioural-only coaching decreased test anxiety and increased academic performance with no other effects. |
description |
Cognitive-only coaching increased deep and achieving learning approaches, academic self-concept, and reduced test anxiety and anxiety/depression, but academic performance declined relative to control; behavioural-only... |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2001 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — grant-2001, grant-2001-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.