Claims

Collaborative inquiry learners obtain significantly higher post-test overall scores than individual learners

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students in the collaborative learning setting obtained significantly higher post-test overall scores compared to individual learners. → Kolloffel 2011

Evidence

Kolloffel 2011

Kolloffel, B., Eysink, T. H. S., & de Jong, T. (2011). Comparing the effects of representational tools in collaborative and individual inquiry learning. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6, 223–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-011-9110-3

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Between-subjects experiment with 61 dyads and 95 individuals in a simulation-based inquiry environment; ANCOVA with math grade and time-on-task as covariates showed "significantly higher post-test overall scores" for the collaborative setting, F(1,201)=17.33, p<.001.

"It was found that students in the collaborative learning setting obtained significantly higher post-test overall scores ( F (1,201)=17.33, p<.001) compared to individual learners."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id collaborative-inquiry-outperforms-individual-overall
title Collaborative inquiry learners obtain significantly higher post-test overall scores than individual learners
description Collaborative inquiry learners obtain significantly higher post-test overall scores than individual learners
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2011
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — kolloffel-2011

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.