Claims

Group testing shows advantages in some studies but mixed results overall for long-term retention and transfer

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoretical r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In one classroom study, the group quiz condition outperformed the individual quiz condition on a surprise test. → Dillon H. Murphy 2023 q2 i? Other studies show group testing is not superior to individual testing for long-term retention and transfer. → Dillon H. Murphy 2023 (2)

Evidence

Dillon H. Murphy 2023

Dillon H. Murphy, Jeri L. Little, Elizabeth L. Bjork. (2023). The Value of Using Tests in Education as Tools for Learning—Not Just for Assessment. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09808-3

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

The commentary reports, citing Cranney et al. (2009), a study comparing a group quiz, an individual quiz, a restudy condition, and a no-activity control on a surprise test after a psychobiology video; "the group quiz condition outperformed the individual quiz condition." No effect size is printed.

"the group quiz condition outperformed the individual quiz condition"

Dillon H. Murphy 2023 (2)

Dillon H. Murphy, Jeri L. Little, Elizabeth L. Bjork. (2023). The Value of Using Tests in Education as Tools for Learning—Not Just for Assessment. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09808-3

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

The commentary states that "research on group testing versus individual testing has yielded mixed results," citing several studies (e.g., LoGiudice et al., 2015; Wissman & Rawson, 2018) in which group testing was not superior for long-term retention and transfer.

"research on group testing versus individual testing has yielded mixed results, with some studies showing that group testing is not superior to individual testing for long-term retention and transfer"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id collaborative-testing-mixed-results
title Group testing shows advantages in some studies but mixed results overall for long-term retention and transfer
description Group testing shows advantages in some studies but mixed results overall for long-term retention and transfer
status review
evidence_strength mixed
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — dillon-h-murphy-2023, dillon-h-murphy-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.