Teaching color Doppler twinkle artifact improved cannulation time with a positive but non-significant impact on success rate¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Using color Doppler to identify twinkle artifact improved cannulation time versus cross-section view only, with a positive but non-significant success-rate effect. → Jørgensen Rasmus 2021
Evidence¶
Jørgensen Rasmus 2021¶
Jørgensen Rasmus, Laursen Christian B., Konge Lars, Pietersen Pia Iben. (2021). Education in the placement of ultrasound-guided peripheral venous catheters: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-021-00897-z
q2 · i? · review · r3
The review reports on Gardecki et al.'s comparison of teaching with color Doppler "twinkle artifacts" against cross-section view only: an effect on cannulation time and a positive but non-significant success-rate impact. No statistics printed.
"The usage of color Doppler function to identify "twinkle artifacts" had an effect on cannulation time and a positive but non-significant impact on the success rate [40]."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.