Combining the instructional video with embedded rating scales yielded the highest immediate recognition, but the advantage faded by delayed posttest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3·i1small
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i1 A three-way Experimental PhaseInstructional VideoEmbedded Rating Scales interaction emerged (η²p=.031): the combined group scored highest at immediate posttest but deteriorated tendentially one week later. → Colin Lescarret 2022
Evidence¶
Colin Lescarret 2022¶
Colin Lescarret, Julien Magnier, Valérie Le Floch, Jean-Christophe Sakdavong, and 2 more. (2022). Do you trust this speaker? The impact of prompting on middle-school students’ consideration of source when watching conflicting videos. Preprint, Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1998147/v1
q3 · i1 · causal · r2
Mixed ANOVA three-way interaction on recognition scores with printed effect size "η²p=.031" (F(1,253)=8.008, p=.005). Students with both prompts scored significantly higher at immediate posttest than the ERS-only (p=.025) and video-only (p=.007) groups, but showed tendential deterioration (p=.051) and did not differ from the ERS-only group at delayed posttest (p=.641).
"An Experimental PhaseInstructional VideoEmbedded Rating Scales interaction effect was also observed, F(1,253)=8.008, p=.005, η²p=.031"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Embedded source credibility rating scales during video viewing improve middle-schoolers' source identity recognition, especially at delayed posttest — related
- Students exposed to embedded rating scales mention interviewees' expertise more often in their convincingness justifications — related
- Watching the sourcing instructional video unexpectedly lowered students' trustworthiness ratings of the interviewees — related
- Watching an instructional video on sourcing before viewing had no significant effect on source recognition or convincingness judgments — related
- Embedded rating scales make middle-schoolers more likely to judge the expert (researcher) speaker as the most convincing — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
combined-prompts-immediate-recognition-advantage-fades |
title |
Combining the instructional video with embedded rating scales yielded the highest immediate recognition, but the advantage faded by delayed posttest |
description |
Combining the instructional video with embedded rating scales yielded the highest immediate recognition, but the advantage faded by delayed posttest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — colin-lescarret-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.