Claims

Perceived deficits in communication quality during robotic surgery are associated with greater estimated blood loss and longer operative time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? For every one standard deviation increase in the perceived deficit in quality of communication, there was an additional 51 ml of estimated blood loss and a 31-minute increase in operative time. → Mahendran Vimaladhithan 2024

Evidence

Mahendran Vimaladhithan 2024

Mahendran Vimaladhithan, Turpin Laura, Boal Matthew, Francis Nader K. (2024). Assessment and application of non-technical skills in robotic-assisted surgery: a systematic review. Surgical Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10713-1

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Cross-sectional intra-operative study by Schiff et al. using the Quality of Communication Questionnaire, reported within the review. The review reports "an additional 51 ml of estimated blood loss and a 31-min increase in operative time" per SD of communication deficit.

"Schiff et al., identified that for every one standard deviation (SD) increase in the deficit in the quality of communication perceived, there was an additional 51 ml of estimated blood loss and a 31-min increase in operative time"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.