Competitor activation relates to negative priming at different time windows in monolinguals and bilinguals¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2011 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Monolinguals showed a positive correlation between competitor activation and negative priming between 433 and 600 ms (r = .39, p < .05). → Blumenfeld Henrike K.; Marian Viorica 2011
q3 i3 Bilinguals showed a negative correlation between competitor activation and negative priming between 666.7 and 833.3 ms (r = −.38, p < .05). → Blumenfeld Henrike K.; Marian Viorica 2011
Evidence¶
Blumenfeld Henrike K.; Marian Viorica 2011¶
Blumenfeld Henrike K.; Marian Viorica. (2011). Bilingualism influences inhibitory control in auditory comprehension. Cognition. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582323/
q3 · i3 · associational · r2
Correlation analysis linking eye-tracking competitor activation to negative-priming effects in the same study. "monolinguals (but not bilinguals) showed a positive relationship between competitor activation and negative priming (r = .39, p < .05)"; bilinguals showed a negative correlation (r = −.38, p < .05) in a later window.
"Between 433 ms and 600 ms post-stimulus onset, monolinguals (but not bilinguals) showed a positive relationship between competitor activation and negative priming (r = .39, p < .05)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Bilinguals maintain target activation longer than monolinguals after the activation peak — related
- Stroop inhibition correlates with linguistic competition resolution in bilinguals but not monolinguals — related
- Monolinguals but not bilinguals show residual inhibition of phonological competitors on negative-priming probes — related
- Monolinguals and bilinguals show similar within-language competitor activation during auditory word recognition — related
- Higher Spanish proficiency in bilinguals is associated with less residual competitor inhibition — related
- Target facilitation and competitor inhibition are strongly correlated in both groups — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
competitor-activation-priming-timecourse-group-differences |
title |
Competitor activation relates to negative priming at different time windows in monolinguals and bilinguals |
description |
Competitor activation relates to negative priming at different time windows in monolinguals and bilinguals |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2011 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — blumenfeld-henrike-k-marian-viorica-2011 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.