Human teacher–GenAI collaboration in embodied mathematics learning calls for a complementary interaction model combining AI feedback with human metacognitive guidance¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q1
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? The article reports, citing Cosentino et al., that embodied mathematics learning with GenAI underscores the need for a complementary interaction model enriching educational process stages. → Ronnie Videla 2025

Evidence¶

Ronnie Videla 2025¶

Ronnie Videla, Simon Penny, Wendy Ross. (2025). 'If you can't dance your program, you can't write it': Challenges and Implications for AI in Education. https://doi.org/10.1145/3759257

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

The article attributes this finding to Cosentino et al.'s study of human teachers and GenAI systems in embodied mathematics learning, describing a model combining GenAI feedback immediacy with human reflective guidance. The article prints no effect sizes for this attributed finding.

"The findings of Cosentino et al. [42] on the relationship between human teachers and GenAi systems in embodied mathematics learning underscore the need for a complementary interaction model, one that enriches various stages of the educational process by combining the immediacy of GenAi-generated feedback wit h the reflective and metacognitive guidance offered by human instructors."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Outsourcing productive struggle to AI risks cognitive debt, and reactive compliance-focused approaches are insufficient — related
• Students exercise ethical agency in GenAI use through human-AI collaboration strategies, personal ethical frameworks, strategic calibration of use, and resistance to over-reliance — related
• First-year EAP students prefer a hybrid feedback model combining AI-generated comments with instructor feedback over either source alone — related
• Excessive dependence on AI may reduce human interaction and dehumanize adult education — related
• Human–GenAI collaborative interactions show promise for supporting metacognition and sociometacognition, based on an exploratory expert case study — related
• Many current GenAI applications in STEM education conflate learning with performance and feedback, neglecting active, reflective, and embodied learning processes — a broader claim this one bears on
• Personalized learning functions as a collaborative human–AI model in which teachers and AI systems play complementary roles — related
• Students bound their reliance on AI feedback and advocate a hybrid model assigning AI broad language concerns and instructors individualized relational guidance — related
• How students and teachers want to interact with classroom AI largely depends on the teacher-student relationships that exist outside of AI use — related
• Embodied GenAI agents in mixed reality raised engagement and lowered cognitive load for 26 post-secondary learners during collaborative problem-solving — related