Claims

Complex learning is lengthy, requiring instruction to account for learners' motivational states and expertise development

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2005 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Because complex learning is a lengthy process, instructional approaches must take learners' motivational states and levels of expertise development into account. → van Merriënboer 2005

Evidence

van Merriënboer 2005

van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions. Educ Psychol Rev 17, 147–177 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0

q2 · i? · review · r?

The review identifies this as the second of three recent developments in CLT for complex learning, stating that "complex learning is a lengthy process requiring learners' motivational states and levels of expertise development to be taken into account." No effect size is printed.

"Second, complex learning is a lengthy process requiring learners' motivational states and levels of expertise development to be taken into account."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id complex-learning-lengthy-motivation-expertise
title Complex learning is lengthy, requiring instruction to account for learners' motivational states and expertise development
description Complex learning is lengthy, requiring instruction to account for learners' motivational states and expertise development
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2005
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-15
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — van-merriënboer-2005

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.