Claims

Task complexity has no significant impact on intrinsic interest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 The impact of task complexity on intrinsic interest was not significant (η2 = 0.00). → Ines Zeitlhofer 2024

Evidence

Ines Zeitlhofer 2024

Ines Zeitlhofer, Joerg Zumbach, Judith Schweppe. (2024). Complexity affects performance, cognitive load, and awareness. Learning and Instruction 94 (2024) 102001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102001

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

Intrinsic interest, measured with the Eccles and Wigfield subscale, did not differ between the consistently high and gradually increasing groups; the printed test was "F (1,84) = 0.06, p < .80, η2 = 0.00".

"Moreover, there was no significant impact of task complexity on intrinsic interest (F (1,84) = 0.06, p < .80, η2 = 0.00)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id complexity-no-intrinsic-interest-effect
title Task complexity has no significant impact on intrinsic interest
description Task complexity has no significant impact on intrinsic interest
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — ines-zeitlhofer-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.