Claims

Grammatical complexity and L2 proficiency interact: complex features benefit more from input at low proficiency, while simple features benefit more from output at high proficiency

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Analysis of individual studies suggests complex grammatical features benefit more from input-based FFI when proficiency is low, whereas simple features benefit more from output-based instruction when proficiency is high. → Schenck 2024

Evidence

Schenck 2024

Schenck, A. (2024). Learning How to Use Input-Based and Output-Based Form-Focused Instruction: A Meta-Analytic Comparison of Persian EFL Learners. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 30. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1457419

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Qualitative examination of individual studies, supported by two studies of intermediate learners (modals, conditionals) with contrasting results; the article reports this relationship "appears evident within past research of Corrective Feedback" as well.

"Whereas complex grammatical features tended to benefit more from input-based FFI when proficiency was low, simplistic grammatical features tended to benefit more from output-based instruction when proficiency is high."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.