Claims

The experimental group showed large gains in high-level performance on every component, with the largest rises on the operational and motivational components

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Table 4 reports high-level percentages rising from initial state to experimental final assessment, e.g. operational from 9.9% to 27.03%, motivational from 14.0% to 24.3%, and the integrative indicator from 9.30% to 21.89%. → Yakymchuk 2018

Evidence

Yakymchuk 2018

Yakymchuk, N. V., Kazachenok, V. V. (2018). Developing Cognitive Independence of Future Informatics Teachers by Multimedia Tools. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 7(3), 581-597. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2018.3.581

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Table 4 of the forming experiment reports final assessments in percentages for each component across initial state, experimental, and control groups. The motivational row shows high-level "14,0 24,3 17,11" and medium-level "35,2 63,5 40,79" percentages.

"Motivational 14,0 24,3 17,11 35,2 63,5 40,79 50,8 12,2 42,11"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.