Claims

Numbers of computers per class differed between schools but not between school types

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Computer availability per class varied across the five schools but showed no pattern distinguishing 'traditional' from 'innovative' schools. → Sandra de Koster 2017

Evidence

Sandra de Koster 2017

Sandra de Koster, Monique Volman, Els Kuiper. (2017). Concept-guided development of technology in 'traditional' and 'innovative' schools: quantitative and qualitative differences in technology integration. Education Tech Research Dev 65:1325–1344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9527-0

q2 · i? · design · r2

Quantitative comparison based on Table 7 of the embedded case studies. Three schools had around seven computers per class on average, while at one 'traditional' and one 'innovative' school each class had around ten; the article reports the numbers "did differ between the schools, but not between the school types".

"The numbers of computers per class (desktop and laptop) did differ between the schools, but not between the school types, as shown in Table 7."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id computers-per-class-no-school-type-difference
title Numbers of computers per class differed between schools but not between school types
description Numbers of computers per class differed between schools but not between school types
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sandra-de-koster-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.