Claims

Group differences in correct ideas were largest in electricity (EG 94% vs CG 65%) and motion of the Earth (EG 76% vs CG 53%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Posttest occurrence of correct ideas differed between groups in electricity (EG 94%, CG 65%) and motion of the Earth (EG 76%, CG 53%). → Michaela Minárechová 2016

Evidence

Michaela Minárechová 2016

Michaela Minárechová. (2016). Using a concept cartoon© method to address elementary school students' ideas about natural phenomena. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, 214-228. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107824

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Content analysis of posttest responses by topic in the quasi-experiment. The article prints the percentages: "EG – 94% occurrence of correct ideas , CG – 65%" for electricity and "EG – 76%, CG – 53%" for the motion of the Earth. No statistical test or effect size is reported for these contrasts.

"We noticed a difference between the groups in area of electricity (EG – 94% occurrence of correct ideas , CG – 65%) and the motion of the Earth (EG – 76%, CG – 53%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.