Claims

Worksheet analysis of three students showed naïve ideas developing from practical verifications of their assumptions, especially in topics new to students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? In all three analysed students, initially imperfect ideas transformed toward improved versions in some answers, especially thermal conductivity and density of matter. → Michaela Minárechová 2016

Evidence

Michaela Minárechová 2016

Michaela Minárechová. (2016). Using a concept cartoon© method to address elementary school students' ideas about natural phenomena. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, Vol. 4, No. 2, 214-228. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1107824

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Analysis of worksheets from three students selected for full attendance, coding four worksheet items with the five analytical categories. "the transformation of students´ initially imperfect ideas towards its improved versions" was found "at all three students", and statements drew on realized practical verifications.

"When we compared the worksheets to posttest we found out the transformation of students´ initially imperfect ideas towards its improved versions in some of their answers (at all three students). It was especially in topics of thermal conductivity and density of matters."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.