Concept map method group scored significantly higher than traditional method group on the second exam¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? On the second exam, the concept map method group's mean score (17.7%) was significantly higher than the traditional method group's (11%). → Krishan 2017

Evidence¶

Krishan 2017¶

Tamara Mohd Altabieri Krishan. (2017). Concept Map Technique as a New Method for Whole Text Translation. English Language Teaching, 10(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n4p62

q2 · i? · causal · r1

One-hour post test comparing Group 1 (traditional) and Group 2 (concept map), 40 students each, by t-test (Table 3); the article reports the difference as significant with value < 0.05, no effect size printed.

"The mean scores of group 2 (concept map method) students (17.7%) was si gnificantly higher than that of group 1 (traditional method) students (11%)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Concept map method group scored significantly higher than traditional method group on the final exam — related
• Concept map method and traditional method groups did not differ significantly on the first exam after training — related
• Total scores were highly significant in favour of the concept map method group (64.4% vs 49.4%) — a broader claim this one bears on