The concept model of vocabulary instruction produced larger gains in content-area vocabulary test performance than the definition/sentence-writing model for all six middle school students with learning disabilities¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · checked against its sources 2026-10-18 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because 2 design pages cite it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across six students with learning disabilities, mean percent correct on weekly vocabulary tests rose from 63.75% under the definition model to 90.67% under the concept model, a 42.23% increase. → Fore III 2007
Evidence¶
Fore III 2007¶
Fore III, C., Boon, R. T., & Lowrie, K. (2007). Vocabulary Instruction for Middle School Students with Learning Disabilities: A Comparison of Two Instructional Models. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(2), 49-73. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ797664
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Multiple-baseline-across-participants study of six seventh-grade students with LD in resource language arts classes; weekly 10-item matching tests scored as percent correct. The article reports "an increase of 42.23%" in group mean from baseline (definition model) to intervention (concept model); no standardized effect size is printed.
"the mean score for all students during baseline was 63.75% correct. The mean score for all students during intervention was 90.67% correct, which was an increase of 42.23%."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Vocabulary — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
-
Outcomes of students with disabilities improve when they receive specially designed instruction responsive to assessment data — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
-
Vocabulary Instruction Improves Comprehension — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Students with learning disabilities reported high satisfaction with learning vocabulary through concept diagrams — related
- After concept-model instruction, students' posttest vocabulary scores ranged from 57.78% to 82.22% correct, compared with pretest scores of 0% to 8.89% — related
- Self-regulated problem-solving instruction produced immediate, marked increases in target behaviors for all four students, with a mean of 2.3 training sessions to reach 80% mastery — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
concept-model-beats-definition-model-vocabulary-ld |
title |
The concept model of vocabulary instruction produced larger gains in content-area vocabulary test performance than the definition/sentence-writing model for all six middle school students with learning disabilities |
description |
The concept model of vocabulary instruction produced larger gains in content-area vocabulary test performance than the definition/sentence-writing model for all six middle school students with learning disabilities |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
source_checked |
2026-10-18 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-07 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — fore-iii-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.