Improvements in learning conditions between October and February predict higher likelihood of a B or better in math the following term¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? A positive change of two scale points in learning conditions was associated with approximately 17% higher likelihood of a B or better in Quarter 3 than no change. → Gripshover 2022

Evidence¶

Gripshover 2022¶

Gripshover, S., Londerée, A., Ahuvia, I., Shyjka, A., Kroshinsky, F., Ryan, N., Farrington, C., & Paunesku, D. (2022). Learning Conditions Are an Actionable, Early Indicator of Math Learning. PERTS & University of Chicago Consortium on School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publication/learning-conditions-are-an-actionable-early-indicator-of-math-learning

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Longitudinal analysis measuring learning conditions twice (October and February 2019–20) and Quarter 3 math grades; the 17% figure is a printed descriptive estimate with no standardized effect size.

"when a student experienced a positive change of two scale points on a seven-point scale, their likelihood of a B or better in Quarter 3 (March) was approximately 17% higher than it would have been if they experienced no change in learning conditions."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Learning conditions worsen slightly but significantly over a school year absent intentional efforts to improve them — related
• Students rating learning conditions most positively are more than twice as likely to earn a B or better in math than students rating them most negatively — related
• Learning conditions predict math grades across racial and socioeconomic groups, with larger associations for FRPL-eligible and Black students — related