Claims

Perturbation type determines the interaction types needed: conflicting evidence elicits argumentation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? When a script provides students with conflicting evidence, more argumentation is required before students can reach an agreement. → Pierre Dillenbourg 2008

Evidence

Pierre Dillenbourg 2008

Pierre Dillenbourg, Fabrice Hong. (2008). The mechanics of CSCL macro scripts. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://hal.science/hal-00692019

q1 · i? · design · r1

Illustrative mechanism from the article's abstract: the nature of the perturbation determines the types of interactions necessary for overcoming it, here conflicting evidence driving argumentation. No empirical data are reported for this instance.

"if a script provides students with conflicting evidence, more argumentation is required before students can reach an agreement"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id conflicting-evidence-increases-argumentation
title Perturbation type determines the interaction types needed: conflicting evidence elicits argumentation
description Perturbation type determines the interaction types needed: conflicting evidence elicits argumentation
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2008
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — pierre-dillenbourg-2008

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.