Interest-enhancing strategies predict persistence for students lower in conscientiousness but not those higher in conscientiousness¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? College students lower in conscientiousness were more likely to persist on a repetitive task if they engaged in strategies to enhance interest; use of these strategies did not predict persistence for those higher in conscientiousness. → Carol Sansone 2026
q2 i? Interest and conscientiousness interacted such that the relationship between interest and reported effort was stronger for students lower in conscientiousness, supporting the CONIC model. → Carol Sansone 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Carol Sansone 2026¶
Carol Sansone, K. Ann Renninger, Judith M. Harackiewicz. (2026). Motivating Self-Regulation: Utility Value, Interest Development, and the Potential for Intervention. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10142-7
q2 · i? · review · r2
Narrative review attributing to Sansone et al. (1999) an experimental study finding that interest-enhancing strategies predicted persistence on a repetitive task for college students lower in conscientiousness but not for those higher in conscientiousness.
"Sansone et al. ( 1999) found in an experimental study that college students lower in conscientiousness were more likely to persist on a repetitive task if they engaged in strategies to enhance interest; use of these strategies did not predict persistence for those higher in conscientiousness"
Carol Sansone 2026 (2)¶
Carol Sansone, K. Ann Renninger, Judith M. Harackiewicz. (2026). Motivating Self-Regulation: Utility Value, Interest Development, and the Potential for Intervention. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10142-7
q2 · i? · review · r2
Narrative review reporting CONIC-model research (Bareis et al., 2024; Trautwein et al., 2015): interest and conscientiousness showed positive main effects on high school and college students' reported effort, plus the reported interaction favoring lower-conscientiousness students.
"these factors interacted such that the relationship between interest and reported effort was stronger for students lower in conscientiousness (Bareis et al., 2024; Trautwein et al., 2015)"
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Personality Traits — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Learners invest more effort in tasks they perceive as interesting, personally important, or useful to their future goals. — a broader claim this one bears on
- Utility-value interventions enhance perceived utility value, engagement, performance, and persistence in introductory college science courses — related
- The CONIC model proposes conscientiousness and interest can partly compensate for one another in explaining academic effort and achievement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
conscientiousness-moderates-interest-regulation-persistence |
title |
Interest-enhancing strategies predict persistence for students lower in conscientiousness but not those higher in conscientiousness |
description |
Interest-enhancing strategies predict persistence for students lower in conscientiousness but not those higher in conscientiousness |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — carol-sansone-2026, carol-sansone-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.