Claims

Interest-enhancing strategies predict persistence for students lower in conscientiousness but not those higher in conscientiousness

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? College students lower in conscientiousness were more likely to persist on a repetitive task if they engaged in strategies to enhance interest; use of these strategies did not predict persistence for those higher in conscientiousness. → Carol Sansone 2026 q2 i? Interest and conscientiousness interacted such that the relationship between interest and reported effort was stronger for students lower in conscientiousness, supporting the CONIC model. → Carol Sansone 2026 (2)

Evidence

Carol Sansone 2026

Carol Sansone, K. Ann Renninger, Judith M. Harackiewicz. (2026). Motivating Self-Regulation: Utility Value, Interest Development, and the Potential for Intervention. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10142-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review attributing to Sansone et al. (1999) an experimental study finding that interest-enhancing strategies predicted persistence on a repetitive task for college students lower in conscientiousness but not for those higher in conscientiousness.

"Sansone et al. ( 1999) found in an experimental study that college students lower in conscientiousness were more likely to persist on a repetitive task if they engaged in strategies to enhance interest; use of these strategies did not predict persistence for those higher in conscientiousness"

Carol Sansone 2026 (2)

Carol Sansone, K. Ann Renninger, Judith M. Harackiewicz. (2026). Motivating Self-Regulation: Utility Value, Interest Development, and the Potential for Intervention. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10142-7

q2 · i? · review · r2

Narrative review reporting CONIC-model research (Bareis et al., 2024; Trautwein et al., 2015): interest and conscientiousness showed positive main effects on high school and college students' reported effort, plus the reported interaction favoring lower-conscientiousness students.

"these factors interacted such that the relationship between interest and reported effort was stronger for students lower in conscientiousness (Bareis et al., 2024; Trautwein et al., 2015)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id conscientiousness-moderates-interest-regulation-persistence
title Interest-enhancing strategies predict persistence for students lower in conscientiousness but not those higher in conscientiousness
description Interest-enhancing strategies predict persistence for students lower in conscientiousness but not those higher in conscientiousness
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — carol-sansone-2026, carol-sansone-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.