Claims

Teachers face stated constraints in arranging non-routine questions and expecting open-ended answers, including classroom culture and monotonous methods

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Based on observation, teachers' difficulties stem from classroom climate, teaching experience favouring monotonous models, curriculum conformity demands, and quantity-oriented learning outcomes. → Hendriana 2017

Evidence

Hendriana 2017

Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E.E., & Hidayat, W. (2017). Metaphorical Thinking Learning and Junior High School Teachers’ Mathematical Questioning Ability. Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1), 55-64. https://jme.ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/jme

q1 · i? · qualitative · r1

Authors' observational account (type e) of constraints faced by junior high mathematics teachers, listed as four points after Table 4; no effect sizes or tests are reported for these constraints.

"The cultural climate of the learning atmosphere in the classroom in applyi ng the learning activities that leads students to think abstractly caused by the in itial conditions of students who are accustomed to only receive learning material without thinking of the material context in more depth."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.