Claims

Control-group students' cognitive structures grew in size, richness and integratedness over 8 weeks, but misconceptions did not change significantly

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Control group size parameter scores increased significantly from pre-test to post-test. → Ceylan 2018 q2 i? Control group correctness parameter scores showed no statistically significant change, indicating misconceptions persisted under the current program. → Ceylan 2018 (2)

Evidence

Ceylan 2018

Ceylan, Ö., & Yiğit, E. A. (2018). Analyzing the Effect of Concept Cartoon Usage on Students’ Cognitive Structures Developments and Science Achievements through Flow Maps. Science Education International, 29(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205414

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Wilcoxon signed-rank test on flow map size parameter (number of sentences expressed) for the 27 control students. Positive ranks favored the post-test, indicating the level of knowledge about the particulate nature of matter unit increased.

"the control group students had a statistically significant difference (z = 4.111, ρ < 0.05) between the pre-test scores of the size parameter after 8 weeks of study"

Ceylan 2018 (2)

Ceylan, Ö., & Yiğit, E. A. (2018). Analyzing the Effect of Concept Cartoon Usage on Students’ Cognitive Structures Developments and Science Achievements through Flow Maps. Science Education International, 29(4). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1205414

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Wilcoxon signed-rank test on flow map correctness parameter (misconception rate) for control students over 8 weeks. No statistically significant change was found, so misconceptions could not be removed by teaching with the current program.

"There was no statistically significant difference (z = 0.488, ρ > 0.05) between the correctness parameter pre-post test scores of the control group at the end of the 8-week period."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.