Control group students valued laboratory group work but also reported boredom with the number and simplicity of experiments¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Confirmatory-laboratory students most frequently reported boredom with the high number of experiments (f=8) and that experiments were easier than their topics (f=6), while valuing harmonious group work (f=6). → Ataman Karacop 2017

Evidence¶

Ataman Karacop 2017¶

Ataman Karacop, Emine Hatun Diken. (2017). The Effects of Jigsaw Technique Based on Cooperative Learning on Prospective Science Teachers' Science Process Skill. Journal of Education and Practice, Vol.8, No.6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133003

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive document analysis of open-ended SOS responses from the 23 control-group student teachers (Table 5); boredom with the high number of experiments was the most frequent comment (f=8), and the article states the group work "was effective in learning the topics through discussion and research".

"We got bored of the high number of the experiments and this affected our learning in a negative way. 8 The student teachers in the control group stated th at the group work based on confirmatory laboratory method was effective in learning the topics through discussion and research."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Achievement Emotions — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Experimental group students valued expert roles and group knowledge exchange but reported boredom, lack of time and uneven member preparation — related
• Student teachers' opinions of the Jigsaw and confirmatory laboratory approaches do not differ significantly — related