Claims

No significant difference between the control group's post-test and its 21-day retention test scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's retention test mean (13.20) did not differ significantly from its post-test mean (13.03); equivalence was not tested. → Coşkun and Eker 2018

Evidence

Coşkun and Eker 2018

İsmail Coşkun, Cevat Eker. (2018). The Effect of Teaching Activities Done by Using Activity Based Posters on the Students' Academic Achievements, Retention Levels in Their Learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research 6(4): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2018.060402

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired t test comparing the control group's post-test (mean 13.03, SS = 4.00) with its retention test (mean 13.20, SS = 4.20), n = 30. Table 10 prints t = 0.17, p = 0.86, which is not significant, although the article's prose again labels the difference significant.

"The difference between retention test scores and academic achievement post -test scores of the control group was compared with the t test and it was found there was a significant difference with the value obtained (t=0,17) and [p<0.05]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.