Control group also improved significantly from pre-test to post-test in both courses¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's pre-test to post-test gain was significant for Course 553 (t = 10.34, df = 17). → Farooq et al. 2012 q2 i? The control group's pre-test to post-test gain was significant for Course 554 (t = 13.96, df = 17). → Farooq et al. 2012 (2)

Evidence¶

Farooq et al. 2012¶

Muhammad U. Farooq, AbdulRahman Al Asmari & Choudhary Z. Javid. (2012). A Study of Online English Language Teacher Education Programmes in Distance Education Context in Pakistan. English Language Teaching, 5(11). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n11p91

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test on Course 553 pre- and post-test marks of the 18-student control group. The article reports "the t-value of comparison wa s 10.34", exceeding the table value of 3.965, indicating a significant gain without the online treatment.

"It was observed that the t-value of comparison wa s 10.34 at the probability level of 0.05 and the degree of freedom was 17. And the t-value was greater than the table valu e which was 3.965. It shows the difference between the marks of pre-test and post-test was significant."

Farooq et al. 2012 (2)¶

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test on Course 554 pre- and post-test marks of the 18-student control group. The article reports "the t-value of comparison was 13.96", exceeding the table value of 3.965, indicating a significant gain without the online treatment.

"It was observed that the t-value of comparison was 13.96 at the probability level of 0.001 and the degree of freedom was 17. And the t-value was greater than the table value which was 3.965. It shows the difference between the marks of pre-test and post-test was significant."

Discussion¶

The traditionally taught control group also improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
Both the experimental and control classes improved significantly from pre-test to post-test in listening — related
The control group taught by the traditional method showed no significant pre-test to post-test improvement — reports the opposite
Experimental group outperformed control group on post-tests in both courses — related

Page metadata

Field	Value
`status`	`review`
`generated`	by `process:wiki-ingest` on `2026-11-03`
`trust`	unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.