Claims

Control-group children taught by the traditional method also showed a small but statistically significant pre-to-post change in lack of attention scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The control group's pre-post LAS mean difference was (.3300) with a calculated T value greater than the tabulated one at α = 0.05, which the author calls a slight difference. → Bulquees Ismail Abdul Majid Daghistan 2016

Evidence

Bulquees Ismail Abdul Majid Daghistan 2016

Bulquees Ismail Abdul Majid Daghistan. (2016). Mind Maps to Modify Lack of Attention among Saudi Kindergarten Children. International Education Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p245

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pre-post LAS comparison for the 17-child control group taught by the traditional method. The article reports the (.3300) mean difference as a slight difference between pre and post test, attributed to the teacher's role and the traditional method used.

"Results showed that the mean difference between the pre and post tests for control group children was (.3300), with (SD = 2.26323), and calculated T. value was (4.61) which is greater than the tabulated one (2.20) at ( α = 0.05) level, and df = (16) as shown in Table 3."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.